Is this the Way Forward? Rethinking the Delivery Nation
In Korea, people can order all sorts of food via delivery apps ranging from ‘Ddokbokki’ to ‘Gamja-tang’. Within 50 minutes - often less- a well-prepared meal arrives in front of your door and when you’re finished, there’s no need to do the dishes - just throw them out.
The convenience brought about by this delivery system is not only captivating, but it corresponds to the desires of the contemporary Korean society: the growth of one-person households and the busy working population often burdened by exhaustive duties at work. Since 2017, single-person households have become the most common type of living arrangement in Korea [1]. At the end of the day, more and more people choose to order their meals on apps than to spend time preparing for their food. The breakout of COIVD-19 has made the delivery market even more lucrative as going outside for lunch or dinner has been discouraged. Consequently, major delivery service platforms have seen their profit skyrocket with increasing users.[2] This year, Statistics Korea (KOSTAT) announced that food delivery transactions from January to July saw an increase of 73.6% from the same months of last year.[3]
[Figure
1] Food Delivery in Korea
[Figure
2] Delivery motorbike parked in front of a building [4]
[Figure
3] Gangbuk Recycling Screening Site [7]
“only 9% of all the plastic waste ever produced has been recycled” (UNEP 2018)
Indeed, the disposal of trash has become
incredibly toilsome with food delivery becoming a daily routine for many
Koreans. The most alarming question for South Korea is, how should we manage
all this trash? The first hint of a waste disposal crisis was unveiled in 2018 when China banned the importation of most plastic waste. Before, Korea had
exported large volumes of its plastic waste to China. Now, exportation is not
an option. This led to a decrease in plastic prices, prompting many recycling
firms to stop collecting garbage. If plastic waste cannot be recycled, the only
options left are incineration and reclamation. Naturally, the cost of incineration
and reclamation skyrocketed from 2016 to 2019. [9]
Meanwhile, the recent announcement on the termination of the Seoul Capital Area
Landfill Site in 2025 shed light on the problem of the lack of alternative
landfill sites within the country.[10] In
truth, large volumes of used plastics are being dumped in uncontrolled sites or
are being littered in the environment.[11]
[Figure
4] Uiseong Trash Mountain 2019 [12]
References
[1] http://news.kbs.co.kr/news/view.do?ncd=4174796
[2] https://www.donga.com/news/Economy/article/all/20200909/102849671/1
[3]https://www.hankyung.com/life/article/2020092098181
[4] https://byline.network/2020/09/09-30/
[5]
https://www.asiae.co.kr/article/2020092210005365672
[6] https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/25496/singleUsePlastic_sustainability.pdf
[7] http://www.greenkorea.org/activity/living-environment/zerowaste/73942/
[8] https://weekly.donga.com/3/all/11/2212716/1
[9] http://news.kbs.co.kr/news/view.do?ncd=4174796
[10] https://imnews.imbc.com/replay/2020/nwdesk/article/5885202_32524.html
[11] http://news.kbs.co.kr/news/view.do?ncd=4179345
[12] https://www.ytn.co.kr/_ln/0103_201901041135067741
[13] https://www.hankyung.com/economy/article/202009043681i
Comments
Post a Comment